"Custody" for Miranda purposes
State v. Corley, 383 S.C. 232, 244, 679 S.E.2d 187, 193 (Ct. App. 2009), aff'd as modified, 392 S.C. 125, 708 S.E.2d 217 (2011)
top of page
.png)
Search
Recent Posts
See AllThe defendant has a fundamental right to testify or not testify. · State v. Rivera, 402 S.C. 225 (2013). While the defendant as a right to be present at trial, they do not have a right to be absent
bottom of page