Everyday Evidence Legal Blog

Advocatus Iustitia Aeque

Daniel Coble

Jun 9

SCRE 702: Daubert/Council Hearing

Daniel Coble

Jun 5

What is "unfair prejudice" under 403?

Daniel Coble

Jun 4

Rule 403: Who has the burden?

Daniel Coble

Jun 4

SCRE 403: 'Unfair prejudice' is separate analysis from 'confusion' and 'misleading'

Daniel Coble

Jun 4

Is the evidence probative under 403? Consider this question

Daniel Coble

May 26

Out of court statements in CSC cases

Daniel Coble

May 18

Rule 403: probative value and unfair prejudice

Daniel Coble

May 15

Follow Up: Opening the Door and Proportionality

Daniel Coble

May 14

An Example of Why the Application of the Rules of Evidence is Difficult

Daniel Coble

May 13

Intent of the Question & Opening the Door: Designed to elicit or answer was gratuitously given?

Daniel Coble

May 8

One more 404(b) case

Daniel Coble

May 8

Another 404(b) case

Daniel Coble

May 7

State v. Wallace takes its final blow

Daniel Coble

May 6

Rule 404(b) Common Scheme or Plan: Logical Connection Test not Similarity Test

Daniel Coble

May 5

FRE 414 and propensity

Daniel Coble

Apr 27

Bruton and non-testifying codefendant's statements inculpating other defendant

Daniel Coble

Apr 19

Rule 106 and the First Circuit: Substantive Mechanism?

Daniel Coble

Apr 14

South Carolina and the Daubert Standard? "Extraordinary similar"

Daniel Coble

Apr 13

Neil v. Biggers Pretrial Identification Procedure

Daniel Coble

Apr 12

Vol. 1 Vol. 2

Everyday Evidence

Everyday Evidence Legal Blog

Advocatus Iustitia Aeque

SCRE 702: Daubert/Council Hearing

What is "unfair prejudice" under 403?

Rule 403: Who has the burden?

SCRE 403: 'Unfair prejudice' is separate analysis from 'confusion' and 'misleading'

Is the evidence probative under 403? Consider this question

Out of court statements in CSC cases

Rule 403: probative value and unfair prejudice

Follow Up: Opening the Door and Proportionality

An Example of Why the Application of the Rules of Evidence is Difficult

Intent of the Question & Opening the Door: Designed to elicit or answer was gratuitously given?

One more 404(b) case

Another 404(b) case

State v. Wallace takes its final blow

Rule 404(b) Common Scheme or Plan: Logical Connection Test not Similarity Test

FRE 414 and propensity

Bruton and non-testifying codefendant's statements inculpating other defendant

Rule 106 and the First Circuit: Substantive Mechanism?

South Carolina and the Daubert Standard? "Extraordinary similar"

Neil v. Biggers Pretrial Identification Procedure

Rule 1006 Summaries: an exception to the best evidence rule SCRE 1002

Blogroll

Legal Links